How to Use Locals Frequently Asked Questions and Help Topics:
https://support.locals.com/en/article/how-do-i-upload-videos-podcasts-photos-r49es4/
If you need more help contact LOCALS Support at:
Santa Surfing Ohana
We offer Ad Free Videos exclusive for our Ohana and exclusive content and fun online activities.
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
LoneRangerTX@LoneRangerTX
October 15, 2026
Gavin Newsom just found out the Constitution has a pecking order.
On Wednesday, the Ninth Circuit Court of Appeals ruled that California cannot require federal immigration agents and other federal officers to wear visible ID while performing their duties.
The law is called the "No Vigilantes Act." Newsom signed it in September 2025 as part of his resistance campaign against President Trump's immigration enforcement. It made it a crime for non-uniformed federal officers to work in California without displaying identification.
The court said no, and it wasn't close.
The ruling was unanimous. Three judges heard the case, and one of them was appointed by Barack Obama.
Judge Mark Bennett wrote that the law tries to "directly regulate the United States" in how it carries out its governmental functions. He also went further than the court did in April, when it first paused the law. In April, the court said the federal government was likely to win. This time Bennett wrote that the United States is "certain to succeed."
Certain. Appeals courts rarely use that word.
California's main defense was that the law treats state and federal officers the same. The court rejected that argument too. Under the Supremacy Clause, states cannot directly regulate federal operations, even when they regulate their own officers the same way.
Newsom never seemed to grasp this. He may be auditioning for the White House, but he's a governor, and governors don't get to write the rulebook for federal law enforcement.
If California wants federal agents to wear visible ID, there's a way to get that. Convince Congress. That's how you change the way the federal government operates. A state can't pass its own criminal law and threaten to prosecute federal officers for doing their jobs.
The Founders saw this coming. In Federalist No. 44, James Madison warned that without federal supremacy, the country would be "a monster, in which the head was under the direction of the members."
Newsom tried to put the head under the direction of one of the members. Today, a unanimous court told him no.
Sources: X; Courthouse News
Interested? Want to learn more about the community?
What else you may like…
Videos
Posts
Articles
00:00:25
OPERATION ECONOMIC OUTCAST NEW SANCTIONS - EXPOSES TREASON TOO!
The Treasury Department Sanctions - Operation Economic Outcast....
Will have HUGE political impacts on America! TREASON EXPOSURE!!
To give you an idea of how big this is...this is a TV Show that features many Spec Operations.
Here's a clip from the show the Lioness on Paramount+ Season 3 Episode 6.
Imagine this US Senator as one member from our Congress or past president / administration! That's how big of an impact this Sanction is and Trump Team is just getting warmed up!!!🔥🔥🔥
00:02:09
This is what happens when people who understand physics, materials, and control systems are left to build on their own. Cold-gas thrusters and suction fans do not care about feelings or slogans; they either generate the force required or the car stays on the ground. Years of calculation, testing, and iteration produced something that can leave the pavement and return to it on purpose.
No one who spent four years learning to spot oppression in engineering textbooks helped design the pressure vessels, the actuators, or the flight software. The people who did the work measured results against reality, not against a checklist of social outcomes. Competence was the only filter that mattered.
Progress still depends on those who can make complicated machines function under real constraints. When that ability is valued over credentials that mainly train people to object, the results speak for themselves
